English
This paper analyzes the conceptions of proof among first-year bachelor's students, future primary school teachers, in the context of current thinking in proof research. Using a questionnaire tailored to this audience, we study the functions of proof that they recognize, as well as their criteria for evaluating the rigor and validity of different types of proof. The results show a clear gap between their ability to identify intellectual, deductive proof as rigorous and the empirical or perceptual approaches relevant to pragmatic proof that they spontaneously mobilize. Explanatory and verification functions dominate, while more social dimensions appear only marginally. These results highlight the need to reinforce, in initial training, the active and diversified appropriation of the activity of proof.
Conférence
Sixth conference of the internation network for didactic Research in University Mathematics (INDRUM 2026)